Strategy Mobile AI

QuickBooks Mobile Vision

Defining the mobile strategy for Intuit's Business Suite transformation

QuickBooks Mobile Vision — Mia narrative screens

My Role

Cross-functional leadership Led mobile strategy across Design, Product, Engineering, and GTM
Workshop design and facilitation Designed and co-facilitated a multi-day workshop to surface assumptions, generate architectural models, and align the team on a direction
Executive influence Created workflow diagrams that reframed how leadership evaluated the architectural decision
Vision definition Defined the mobile North Star across three pillars and built a prototype narrative to make the strategy tangible for stakeholders

Executive summary

When Intuit was shifting to a Business Suite model, the assumption was that mobile would mirror web. No one had tested it or asked if it made sense. We challenged that assumption. I built a case for a different direction and defined a vision for the mobile experience. The result was a new architecture, headcount to build it, and a concept that became QuickBooks' next major AI initiative.

Project background: the Business Suite shift

Intuit is evolving from standalone products, QuickBooks, Mailchimp, TurboTax, into a connected Business Suite, shifting the business model toward modular adoption, cross-product engagement, and higher lifetime value. On web, the team had a strategy around a platform with many apps, and launched an alpha. Users log into a central platform experience and navigate out to distinct apps like Accounting or Customers.

Mobile had no equivalent direction. My team was tasked with defining what the mobile experience of this Business Suite should be. Leadership was leaning toward following the web structure, since cross-platform consistency is a common industry pattern. But we believed mobile needed its own approach. Users have different mindsets and behave differently on mobile, and the platform itself has different capabilities.

The problem statement

  1. How should the Business Suite strategy adapt for mobile, given its platform constraints and user behaviors?
  2. Where could mobile deliver unique value that web fundamentally cannot?

I framed the problem this way so it opened us to the possibilities of mobile, rather than treating web parity as the starting point.

Aligning the team through a workshop

Our team knew web parity wasn't the right call, but we didn't have the shared language to explain why. I designed a multi-day workshop to solve that. I structured it so we had shared context before we generated solutions: we reviewed the web strategy together, mapped the full user journey, and established design principles as a group. Then we surfaced opportunities, wrote how-might-we statements, brainstormed ideas, and storyboarded the strongest concepts.

I walked away with a decision on mobile strategy and a set of ideas to build a vision around.

FigJam board from the mobile strategy workshop

Three models came out of the workshop:

Option 1

Many Apps

One app per product, mirroring the web. Users would download and switch between multiple separate apps to run their business. Fragmented workflows, high user friction, and substantial design and engineering overhead.

Option 2

Three Super Apps

Grouped by business domain and job-to-be-done. Users complete end-to-end workflows without interruption. Feasible within a 12-month horizon.

Option 3

One Unified App

A single destination for everything. Compelling long-term but has performance and execution risks.

Diagram comparing the three architectural structures — Many Apps, Three Super Apps, One Unified App

The decision

Against our shared criteria, the choice was clear. Three Super Apps minimized friction, delivered cross-product value, and was executable. The team aligned.

Getting leadership on board

Aligning our own team was the easier half. Getting leadership and the web team on board was harder.

Cross-platform consistency is a common industry pattern, and the web team had already shipped an alpha. Instead of debating the principle, I made the cost of it visible.

I built workflow diagrams showing tasks like interacting with a lead, converting them to a customer, getting paid. In the many-apps model, users had to download multiple apps and switch between them to complete a single flow. In the Super Apps model, the same tasks happened without interruption.

Workflow diagrams comparing Many Apps vs. Three Super Apps for the same task

The diagrams shifted the question from "Should mobile match web?" to "Which structure serves mobile users best?" Leaderhip and the web team aligned on Three Super Apps.

The vision: three pillars of the experience

With the architecture settled, I focused on the experience vision. Mobile shouldn't just be a smaller version of web. It needs to lean into what makes mobile different.

I framed the vision around three pillars that work as a system, addressing different phases of the customer journey: getting into QuickBooks, using QuickBooks, and growing through QuickBooks. I built prototype screens around Mia, a landscaping business owner, to show how each pillar would work across her day.

To make the strategy tangible, I built a narrative around Mia, a landscaping business owner, and showed how the pillars connect across her business journey.

1

Mobile-native capabilities

Leverage hardware and platform to simplify workflows in ways web cannot. Drives acquisition and reduces onboarding friction.

2

Agentic AI experiences

AI agents handle administrative work proactively, saving time and deepening product engagement over time.

3

Contextual growth pathways

Growth opportunities embedded in workflows rather than layered on top, encouraging expansion naturally.

1 — Mobile-native capabilities

Mobile should lean into what differentiates it from web. Mobile hardware and platform capabilities make it possible to simplify workflows in ways web cannot. For the vision presentation, I mocked up multiple ideas:

  • iOS App Clips to try features before downloading
  • Voice-led onboarding to cut setup friction and reduce manual data entry
  • Siri-based business queries for hands-free updates while in the field
  • Tap to Pay to collect payments on site

Deep dive: App Clips as an acquisition engine

One barrier to mobile acquisition is that people don't know how QuickBooks will help them. To address this, I designed a top-of-funnel flow that demonstrated value immediately. When Mia discovers QuickBooks through a Google search, she is able to try the invoicing feature via App Clip. She can customize and send a sample invoice to herself before ever downloading the full app.

This shows how mobile could support acquisition by demonstrating value before committing to a download.

From the vision presentation
App Clips flow

2 — Agentic AI experiences

Small business owners are constantly juggling administrative overhead. I envisioned a future where AI agents work proactively in the background to save people time and effort.

  • Customers Agent surfaces leads, drafts estimates, and supports conversion
  • Projects Agent creates projects from client interactions, drafts invoices, schedules payments, and tracks progress
  • Accounting Agent reconciles transactions and handles bookkeeping

Deep dive: the Projects Agent

The Projects Agent proactively creates projects based on Mia's client interactions, drafts invoices, and manages payment schedules. Mia can check financial progress using Siri while away from her desk.

This illustrated how AI agents save small business owners time, reduce cognitive load, and increase product stickiness by staying embedded in daily workflows.

From the vision presentation
Projects Agent flow

3 — Contextual growth pathways

To support modular adoption and cross-product engagement, I designed growth into the workflows rather than layering it on top.

  • Upgrade prompts that appear only after successful task completion
  • Behavioral recommendations based on recent activity
  • In-context trials of higher-tier features so users experience value before being asked to pay for it

Together, the three pillars work as a system. Native capabilities drive adoption. Agentic AI deepens engagement. Contextual growth creates expansion without interrupting the experience.

What the strategy unlocked

The project repositioned mobile from a companion app to a growth driver, changing how leadership thought about mobile's strategic role in the Business Suite.

Headcount allocated

20+ engineers and 2 designers committed to execute the strategy.

New AI initiative

Customer Agent became QuickBooks' next major AI initiative, with a dedicated team formed to build it.

Roadmap additions

Voice Onboarding and App Clips were added to the roadmap with engineering resources allocated to explore both.

What I learned

Design principles are good guidelines. But sometimes the work is recognizing when a principle doesn't serve your users, and having the conviction to make that case./p>

The hardest part was aligning a large cross-functional group on a high-impact strategy. I learned to address leadership's concerns directly and meet people where they were. My through-line: I create impact by making tradeoffs visible, building shared frameworks, and turning strategy into something concrete enough for a team to move on.